Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial en inglés
Current Opinion in Structural Biology aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two years. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion of the topics discussed.In Current Opinion in Structural Biology we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner:
1. The views of experts on current advances in their field in a clear and readable form.
2. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications.
Current Opinion in Structural Biology will serve as an invaluable source of information for researchers, lecturers, teachers, professionals, policy makers and students.
Division of the subject into sections
The subject of Structural Biology is divided into twelve themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year. Each issue contains two sections, and the amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance.Folding and Binding Nucleic acids and their protein complexesMacromolecular Machines Theory and Simulation Sequences and Topology New constructs and expression of proteins Membranes Engineering and Design Carbohydrate-protein interactions and glycosylation Biophysical and molecular biological methods Multi-protein assemblies in signalling Catalysis and Regulation Selection of topics to be reviewed
Section Editors, who are major authorities in the field, are appointed by the Editors of the journal. They divide their section into a number of topics, ensuring that the field is comprehensively covered and that all issues of current importance are emphasised. Section Editors commission reviews from authorities on each topic that they have selected. The Editorial Board provides support to the Editors and the Section Editors with their comments and suggestions on names and topics.
Review articles in Current Opinion in Structural Biology are by invitation only.
Review Articles
Authors write short review articles in which they present recent developments in their subject, emphasizing the aspects that, in their opinion, are most important. In addition, they provide short annotations to the papers that they consider to be most interesting from all those published in their topic over the previous two years.
Editorial Overview
Section Editors write a short overview at the beginning of the section to introduce the reviews and to draw the reader's attention to any particularly interesting developments.
This successful format has made Current Opinion in Structural Biology one of the most highly regarded review journals in the field with an Impact factor of 9.344.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
No disponibles.
Disponibilidad
Institución detectada | Período | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
---|---|---|---|---|
No detectada | desde feb. 1991 / hasta dic. 2023 | ScienceDirect |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
revistas
ISSN impreso
0959-440X
ISSN electrónico
1879-033X
Editor responsable
Elsevier
País de edición
Países Bajos
Fecha de publicación
1991-
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
Transition-state analogues
Richard Wolfenden; Anna Radzicka
Palabras clave: Molecular Biology; Structural Biology.
Pp. 780-787
Control by phosphorylation
Louise N Johnson; Marc O'Reilly
Pp. 762-769
Histo-blood group antigens as mediators of infections
Julie E Heggelund; Annabelle Varrot; Anne Imberty; Ute Krengel
Pp. 190-200
Conformational preferences and phase behavior of intrinsically disordered low complexity sequences: insights from multiscale simulations
Kiersten M Ruff; Rohit V Pappu; Alex S Holehouse
Palabras clave: Molecular Biology; Structural Biology.
Pp. 1-10
Deep learning approaches for de novo drug design: An overview
Mingyang Wang; Zhe Wang; Huiyong Sun; Jike Wang; Chao Shen; Gaoqi Weng; Xin Chai; Honglin Li; Dongsheng Cao; Tingjun Hou
Pp. 135-144