Catálogo de publicaciones - libros
Governance and Performance of Education Systems
Nils C. Soguel ; Pierre Jaccard (eds.)
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial
No disponible.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
No disponibles.
Disponibilidad
| Institución detectada | Año de publicación | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No detectada | 2008 | SpringerLink |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
libros
ISBN impreso
978-1-4020-6445-6
ISBN electrónico
978-1-4020-6446-3
Editor responsable
Springer Nature
País de edición
Reino Unido
Fecha de publicación
2008
Información sobre derechos de publicación
© Springer 2008
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
Introduction: Governance and Performance of Education Systems
Nils C. Soguel; Pierre Jaccard
It is said that travel broadens the mind. Features of one’s home environment hitherto taken for granted are challenged by what one sees elsewhere. One begins to think differently and, almost inevitably, to behave differently. But as far as expanding one’s view of education is concerned, travel – whether actual, by visiting education institutions abroad, or virtual, by studying first-hand accounts, film, etc. – is unlikely to provoke a re-evaluation of core assumptions about the responsibilities of the student in a formal educational setting. In education systems worldwide, students are expected to learn what other people have decided they should be taught. Students are sometimes given a menu of curriculum options from which to choose, but if they would prefer to learn something completely different this predilection will seldom be catered to or even acknowledged. Student-initiated curricula – that is, curricula conceived and formulated by the students themselves – are very rare within formal education. Fundamental decisions about the content of the formal curriculum are normally taken by teachers, the school board, the local education authority, or central government.
- Introduction: Governance and Performance of Education Systems | Pp. 1-10
The New Regulation Forms of Educational Systems in Europe: Towards a Post-bureaucratic Regime
Christian Maroy
It is said that travel broadens the mind. Features of one’s home environment hitherto taken for granted are challenged by what one sees elsewhere. One begins to think differently and, almost inevitably, to behave differently. But as far as expanding one’s view of education is concerned, travel – whether actual, by visiting education institutions abroad, or virtual, by studying first-hand accounts, film, etc. – is unlikely to provoke a re-evaluation of core assumptions about the responsibilities of the student in a formal educational setting. In education systems worldwide, students are expected to learn what other people have decided they should be taught. Students are sometimes given a menu of curriculum options from which to choose, but if they would prefer to learn something completely different this predilection will seldom be catered to or even acknowledged. Student-initiated curricula – that is, curricula conceived and formulated by the students themselves – are very rare within formal education. Fundamental decisions about the content of the formal curriculum are normally taken by teachers, the school board, the local education authority, or central government.
Part One - The Changing Governance of Educational Systems | Pp. 13-33
Comparing Higher Education Governance Systems in Four European Countries
Harry F. de Boer; Jürgen Enders; Uwe Schimank
It is said that travel broadens the mind. Features of one’s home environment hitherto taken for granted are challenged by what one sees elsewhere. One begins to think differently and, almost inevitably, to behave differently. But as far as expanding one’s view of education is concerned, travel – whether actual, by visiting education institutions abroad, or virtual, by studying first-hand accounts, film, etc. – is unlikely to provoke a re-evaluation of core assumptions about the responsibilities of the student in a formal educational setting. In education systems worldwide, students are expected to learn what other people have decided they should be taught. Students are sometimes given a menu of curriculum options from which to choose, but if they would prefer to learn something completely different this predilection will seldom be catered to or even acknowledged. Student-initiated curricula – that is, curricula conceived and formulated by the students themselves – are very rare within formal education. Fundamental decisions about the content of the formal curriculum are normally taken by teachers, the school board, the local education authority, or central government.
Part One - The Changing Governance of Educational Systems | Pp. 35-54
Purpose and Limits of a National Monitoring of the Education System Through Indicators
Stefan C. Wolter
It is said that travel broadens the mind. Features of one’s home environment hitherto taken for granted are challenged by what one sees elsewhere. One begins to think differently and, almost inevitably, to behave differently. But as far as expanding one’s view of education is concerned, travel – whether actual, by visiting education institutions abroad, or virtual, by studying first-hand accounts, film, etc. – is unlikely to provoke a re-evaluation of core assumptions about the responsibilities of the student in a formal educational setting. In education systems worldwide, students are expected to learn what other people have decided they should be taught. Students are sometimes given a menu of curriculum options from which to choose, but if they would prefer to learn something completely different this predilection will seldom be catered to or even acknowledged. Student-initiated curricula – that is, curricula conceived and formulated by the students themselves – are very rare within formal education. Fundamental decisions about the content of the formal curriculum are normally taken by teachers, the school board, the local education authority, or central government.
Part Two - Performance Monitoring and Evaluation | Pp. 57-84
Measuring and Comparing the Equity of Education Systems in Europe
Marc Demeuse; Ariane Baye
It is said that travel broadens the mind. Features of one’s home environment hitherto taken for granted are challenged by what one sees elsewhere. One begins to think differently and, almost inevitably, to behave differently. But as far as expanding one’s view of education is concerned, travel – whether actual, by visiting education institutions abroad, or virtual, by studying first-hand accounts, film, etc. – is unlikely to provoke a re-evaluation of core assumptions about the responsibilities of the student in a formal educational setting. In education systems worldwide, students are expected to learn what other people have decided they should be taught. Students are sometimes given a menu of curriculum options from which to choose, but if they would prefer to learn something completely different this predilection will seldom be catered to or even acknowledged. Student-initiated curricula – that is, curricula conceived and formulated by the students themselves – are very rare within formal education. Fundamental decisions about the content of the formal curriculum are normally taken by teachers, the school board, the local education authority, or central government.
Part Two - Performance Monitoring and Evaluation | Pp. 85-106
The Economic Benefits of Improved Teacher Quality
Eric A. Hanushek
It is said that travel broadens the mind. Features of one’s home environment hitherto taken for granted are challenged by what one sees elsewhere. One begins to think differently and, almost inevitably, to behave differently. But as far as expanding one’s view of education is concerned, travel – whether actual, by visiting education institutions abroad, or virtual, by studying first-hand accounts, film, etc. – is unlikely to provoke a re-evaluation of core assumptions about the responsibilities of the student in a formal educational setting. In education systems worldwide, students are expected to learn what other people have decided they should be taught. Students are sometimes given a menu of curriculum options from which to choose, but if they would prefer to learn something completely different this predilection will seldom be catered to or even acknowledged. Student-initiated curricula – that is, curricula conceived and formulated by the students themselves – are very rare within formal education. Fundamental decisions about the content of the formal curriculum are normally taken by teachers, the school board, the local education authority, or central government.
Part Two - Performance Monitoring and Evaluation | Pp. 107-135
Direct Democracy and Public Education in Swiss Cantons
Justina A.V. Fischer
It is said that travel broadens the mind. Features of one’s home environment hitherto taken for granted are challenged by what one sees elsewhere. One begins to think differently and, almost inevitably, to behave differently. But as far as expanding one’s view of education is concerned, travel – whether actual, by visiting education institutions abroad, or virtual, by studying first-hand accounts, film, etc. – is unlikely to provoke a re-evaluation of core assumptions about the responsibilities of the student in a formal educational setting. In education systems worldwide, students are expected to learn what other people have decided they should be taught. Students are sometimes given a menu of curriculum options from which to choose, but if they would prefer to learn something completely different this predilection will seldom be catered to or even acknowledged. Student-initiated curricula – that is, curricula conceived and formulated by the students themselves – are very rare within formal education. Fundamental decisions about the content of the formal curriculum are normally taken by teachers, the school board, the local education authority, or central government.
Part Two - Performance Monitoring and Evaluation | Pp. 137-153
School Factors Related to Quality: Multilevel Analysis for Three Swiss Cantons
Ivar Trippolini
It is said that travel broadens the mind. Features of one’s home environment hitherto taken for granted are challenged by what one sees elsewhere. One begins to think differently and, almost inevitably, to behave differently. But as far as expanding one’s view of education is concerned, travel – whether actual, by visiting education institutions abroad, or virtual, by studying first-hand accounts, film, etc. – is unlikely to provoke a re-evaluation of core assumptions about the responsibilities of the student in a formal educational setting. In education systems worldwide, students are expected to learn what other people have decided they should be taught. Students are sometimes given a menu of curriculum options from which to choose, but if they would prefer to learn something completely different this predilection will seldom be catered to or even acknowledged. Student-initiated curricula – that is, curricula conceived and formulated by the students themselves – are very rare within formal education. Fundamental decisions about the content of the formal curriculum are normally taken by teachers, the school board, the local education authority, or central government.
Part Two - Performance Monitoring and Evaluation | Pp. 155-186
Are Swiss Secondary Schools Efficient?
Muriel Meunier
It is said that travel broadens the mind. Features of one’s home environment hitherto taken for granted are challenged by what one sees elsewhere. One begins to think differently and, almost inevitably, to behave differently. But as far as expanding one’s view of education is concerned, travel – whether actual, by visiting education institutions abroad, or virtual, by studying first-hand accounts, film, etc. – is unlikely to provoke a re-evaluation of core assumptions about the responsibilities of the student in a formal educational setting. In education systems worldwide, students are expected to learn what other people have decided they should be taught. Students are sometimes given a menu of curriculum options from which to choose, but if they would prefer to learn something completely different this predilection will seldom be catered to or even acknowledged. Student-initiated curricula – that is, curricula conceived and formulated by the students themselves – are very rare within formal education. Fundamental decisions about the content of the formal curriculum are normally taken by teachers, the school board, the local education authority, or central government.
Part Two - Performance Monitoring and Evaluation | Pp. 187-202
Funding Schools by Formula
Rosalind Levačić
It is said that travel broadens the mind. Features of one’s home environment hitherto taken for granted are challenged by what one sees elsewhere. One begins to think differently and, almost inevitably, to behave differently. But as far as expanding one’s view of education is concerned, travel – whether actual, by visiting education institutions abroad, or virtual, by studying first-hand accounts, film, etc. – is unlikely to provoke a re-evaluation of core assumptions about the responsibilities of the student in a formal educational setting. In education systems worldwide, students are expected to learn what other people have decided they should be taught. Students are sometimes given a menu of curriculum options from which to choose, but if they would prefer to learn something completely different this predilection will seldom be catered to or even acknowledged. Student-initiated curricula – that is, curricula conceived and formulated by the students themselves – are very rare within formal education. Fundamental decisions about the content of the formal curriculum are normally taken by teachers, the school board, the local education authority, or central government.
Part Three - Explaining and Controlling the Costs of Education Systems | Pp. 205-245