Catálogo de publicaciones - libros

Compartir en
redes sociales


Título de Acceso Abierto

Problem Solving in Mathematics Education

Parte de: ICME-13 Topical Surveys

Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial

No disponible.

Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial

Mathematics Education: Learning and Instruction

Disponibilidad
Institución detectada Año de publicación Navegá Descargá Solicitá
No requiere 2016 Directory of Open access Books acceso abierto
No requiere 2016 SpringerLink acceso abierto

Información

Tipo de recurso:

libros

ISBN impreso

978-3-319-40729-6

ISBN electrónico

978-3-319-40730-2

Editor responsable

Springer Nature

País de edición

Reino Unido

Fecha de publicación

Tabla de contenidos

Problem Solving in Mathematics Education

Peter Liljedahl; Manuel Santos-Trigo; Uldarico Malaspina; Regina Bruder

Problem solving in mathematics education has been a prominent research field that aims at understanding and relating the processes involved in solving problems to students’ development of mathematical knowledge and problem solving competencies. The accumulated knowledge and field developments include conceptual frameworks to characterize learners’ success in problem solving activities, cognitive, metacognitive, social and affective analysis, curriculum proposals, and ways to foster problem solving approaches. In the survey, four interrelated areas are reviewed: (i) the relevance of heuristics in problem solving approaches—why are they important and what research tells us about their use? (ii) the need to characterize and foster creative problem solving approaches—what type of heuristics helps learners think of and practice creative solutions? (iii) the importance for learners to formulate and pursue their own problems; and (iv) the role played by the use of both multiple purpose and ad hoc mathematical action types of technologies in problem solving activities—what ways of reasoning do learners construct when they rely on the use of digital technologies and how technology and technology approaches can be reconciled?

Pp. 1-39