Catálogo de publicaciones - libros
Who's Who in Orthopedics
Seyed Behrooz Mostofi
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial
No disponible.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
Orthopedics; History of Medicine
Disponibilidad
Institución detectada | Año de publicación | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
---|---|---|---|---|
No detectada | 2005 | SpringerLink |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
libros
ISBN impreso
978-1-85233-786-5
ISBN electrónico
978-1-84628-070-2
Editor responsable
Springer Nature
País de edición
Reino Unido
Fecha de publicación
2005
Información sobre derechos de publicación
© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
Donald Barclay Slocum 1911–1983
Palabras clave: Orthopedic Surgery; American Orthopedic; Orthopedic Society; Sacred Heart Hospital; Lieutenant Colonel.
Pp. 307-308
Ian Scott Smillie 1907–1992
Palabras clave: Gold Medal; Expert Surgeon; Sahara Desert; Orthopedic Service; Severe Physical Disability.
Pp. 308-309
Robert William Smith 1807–1873
Palabras clave: Orthopedic Surgery; Distal Radius; Femoral Neck Fracture; Harvard Medical School; Joint Date.
Pp. 309-310
M.N. Smith-Petersen 1886–1953
Palabras clave: Orthopedic Surgery; Femoral Neck Fracture; Harvard Medical School; London Hospital; Honorary Fellowship.
Pp. 310-311
Harold Augustus Sofield 1900–1987
Palabras clave: Osteogenesis Imperfecta; Orthopedic Resi; Amherst College; State Medical Society; Shriner Hospital.
Pp. 312-313
Edgar William Somerville 1913–1996
Palabras clave: Orthopedic Research; Coxa Vara; Derotation Osteotomy; Orthopedic Service; State Medical Society.
Pp. 313-314
James Spencer Speed 1890–1970
Palabras clave: Orthopedic Surgery; Coxa Vara; Derotation Osteotomy; Orthopedic Service; County Medical Society.
Pp. 314-316
Richard N. Stauffer 1938–1998
Palabras clave: Orthopedic Surgery; Total Joint Replacement; Johns Hopkins Hospital; Allegheny General Hospital; Mayo Medical School.
Pp. 316-317
George Frederic Still 1868–1941
Seyed Behrooz Mostofi
Cluster analysis is an exploratory technique. Functional data methods offer the advantage of allowing a greater variety of clustering matrixes to choose from. The examples involving the clustering of Canadian weather stations are meant to be illustrative, since the known locations of weather stations can be used to infer which ones should exhibit similar weather patterns. The objective is not so much to find “real” clusters of stations, but rather to learn how the weather patterns at the different stations are related. Some of the clusters obtained consist of stations that are located in the same region, which we would expect similar to have weather patterns. Other aspects of the clustering are harder to interpret (e.g., assignment of Prince Rupert and Halifax to the same cluster), although they may also indicate relationships in weather patterns for stations at some distance from each other. A cluster analysis that accounted for both precipitation and temperature (and other weather related variables such as humidity) might be preferable, provided a suitable clustering metric could be found.
Methods for determining the number of clusters in functional cluster analysis are identical to those in the classical case, and thus are not discussed further here.
If groupings for some of the data are known in advance, it may be preferable to use a discriminant function analysis to find the variables and matrix that best classify the remaining observations. In the chapter on functional generalized linear models, we use a form of discriminant function analysis, functional logistic models, to classify the weather stations.
Pp. 322-323
Frank Stinchfield 1910–1992
Seyed Behrooz Mostofi
Cluster analysis is an exploratory technique. Functional data methods offer the advantage of allowing a greater variety of clustering matrixes to choose from. The examples involving the clustering of Canadian weather stations are meant to be illustrative, since the known locations of weather stations can be used to infer which ones should exhibit similar weather patterns. The objective is not so much to find “real” clusters of stations, but rather to learn how the weather patterns at the different stations are related. Some of the clusters obtained consist of stations that are located in the same region, which we would expect similar to have weather patterns. Other aspects of the clustering are harder to interpret (e.g., assignment of Prince Rupert and Halifax to the same cluster), although they may also indicate relationships in weather patterns for stations at some distance from each other. A cluster analysis that accounted for both precipitation and temperature (and other weather related variables such as humidity) might be preferable, provided a suitable clustering metric could be found.
Methods for determining the number of clusters in functional cluster analysis are identical to those in the classical case, and thus are not discussed further here.
If groupings for some of the data are known in advance, it may be preferable to use a discriminant function analysis to find the variables and matrix that best classify the remaining observations. In the chapter on functional generalized linear models, we use a form of discriminant function analysis, functional logistic models, to classify the weather stations.
Pp. 323-325