Catálogo de publicaciones - libros

Compartir en
redes sociales


Título de Acceso Abierto

Tales of Research Misconduct: A Lacanian Diagnostics of Integrity Challenges in Science Novels

Parte de: Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy

Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial

No disponible.

Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial

research integrity; scientific misconduct; science novels; Lacanian psychoanalysis; continental philosophy; falsification; plagiarism; ethics

Disponibilidad
Institución detectada Año de publicación Navegá Descargá Solicitá
No requiere 2017 Directory of Open access Books acceso abierto
No requiere 2017 SpringerLink acceso abierto

Información

Tipo de recurso:

libros

ISBN impreso

978-3-319-65553-6

ISBN electrónico

978-3-319-65554-3

Editor responsable

Springer Nature

País de edición

Reino Unido

Fecha de publicación

Tabla de contenidos

The Catwalk and the Mousetrap: Reading Diederik Stapel’s as a Misconduct Novel

Hub Zwart

Diederik Stapel (1966) was a Dutch social psychologist who obtained his Ph.D. at the (in 1997), became professor of social psychology at the University of (in 2000) and subsequently at (in 2006). Here, he was appointed as Director of the (TIBER) and as Dean of the . In 2011, however, he formally and publicly admitted to having fabricated and manipulated data for at least 55 publications, from 2003 onwards. Because of the prominence of the perpetrator and the astounding scale of the fraud, Stapelgate quickly became a widely publicised and discussed misconduct case, both in the Netherlands and abroad, − and something of an epistemic trauma: for academic research in general and for social psychology in particular. Indeed, the name Stapel became synonymous with scientific fraud as such. After his formal dismissal and public condemnation (by a triad of committees established by three universities to investigate the case in depth), Stapel became marginalised and fell into a deep depression. Yet, in 2012 he resurfaced with an autobiographical account in Dutch entitled (Derailment), the first in a series of literary books written in the wake of his exposure, containing reflections on his experiences from a first-person perspective (Stapel 2012).

Pp. 211-244

Concluding Remarks

Hub Zwart

The aim of continental philosophy, as Hegel phrased it, is to develop a diagnostics of the present. This monograph adheres to this vocation by regarding research misconduct as a symptom, reflecting current changes in the ways in which knowledge is produced and evaluated. From a continental philosophy of science perspective, scientific research is a profoundly socio-cultural phenomenon, a transformative practice pervading society while at the same time being affected by social dynamics. Our overall starting point has been Lacan’s formula describing university discourse:

Pp. 245-254