Catálogo de publicaciones - libros

Despite the overall excellent outcome of neurosurgery in patients with Parkinson’s disease, there is often a contrast between the improvement in motor disability and the difficulties of patients to reintegrate a normal life. In this study, the personal, familial and professional difficulties experienced by patients two years after bilateral high frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus were carefully analyzed. To avoid such socio-familial maladjustment, we strongly suggest taking into consideration the patients’ psychological and social context before the operation and during the post-operative follow-up.

The placebo effect can be encountered in a great variety of medical conditions, but is particularly prominent in pain, depression and Parkinson’s disease. It has been shown that placebo responses play a part in the effect of any type of treatment for Parkinson’s disease, including drug therapy, deep brain stimulation and dopamine tissue transplantation. Recent studies have demonstrated that the placebo effect in Parkinson’s disease is related to the release of substantial amounts of endogenous dopamine in both the dorsal and ventral striatum. As the ventral striatum is involved in reward processing, these observations suggest that the placebo effect may be linked to reward mechanisms. In keeping with this placebo-reward model, most recent experiments have shown activation of the reward circuitry in association with placebo responses in other disorders. In addition, as dopamine is the major neurotransmitter in the reward circuitry, the model predicts that the release of dopamine in the ventral striatum could be involved in mediating placebo responses not only in Parkinson’s but also in other medical conditions.

Levodopa has been the gold standard for Parkinson’s disease (PD) therapy since it was successfully introduced in 1967. But in the years since then, after recognizing that levodopa often leads to the motor complications of wearing-off and dyskinesias, there have been debates among clinicians as to when levodopa therapy should be started. Delaying therapy was advocated for the purpose of delaying the development of these motor complications. This became more popular as the dopamine agonists became available. Although less potent than levodopa in ameliorating the symptoms of PD, they were much less likely to produce the unwanted motor complications, even though they had their own adverse effects. When it was recognized that dopamine, itself, might be a factor leading to the death of dopaminergic neurons through its contributing to the formation of oxyradicals, a new concern arose, namely that levodopa, through its conversion to brain dopamine, might add to the existing oxidative stress and possibly enhance neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons. Though widely debated and without definite evidence, this possibility was sufficient to make some clinicians have further reason to delay the start of levodopa therapy. The ELLDOPA study was created to test this hypothesis. The clinical component of the study failed to find an enhancement of PD symptoms after levodopa was withdrawn following 40 weeks of levodopa therapy. Rather, the clinical results indicated that the symptoms had progressed much less than placebo, and in a doseresponse manner. This suggests that levodopa may actually have neuroprotective properties. The uncertainty that a 2-week withdrawal of levodopa may not have entirely eliminated its symptomatic benefit and the discordant results of the neuroimaging component of the ELLDOPA study have created even more uncertainty that levodopa is neuroprotective. A survey of neurologists who treat PD patients showed that the vast majority of these clinicians do not believe levodopa is neuroprotective, and they remain concerned about the drug’s likelihood of inducing motor complications. Thus, the ELLDOPA study failed to change the treating pattern of PD, and the clinicians require more convincing evidence of either neuroprotection or neurotoxicity of levodopa before they would alter their treatment approach.

Levodopa has been a milestone in the history of PD treatment and it is the axis of therapeutic strategies. It continues to be the “gold standard”, being the most physiological and potent antiparkinsonian agent, with good balance of action on D_1–D_2 receptors. The association of dopaminergic agonists, the “silver standard” is the best combination in the therapeutic of this disease. The new drugs, with different receptorial profiles will enable both monotherapy and multiple pharmacological associations, as well as combinations with advanced technics.

Studying potential neuroprotective therapy for Parkinson’s disease is conceptually problematic because of the heterogenous nature of the Parkinson’s syndrome and complexities in operational definitions for neuroprotection. The current literature concerning neuroprotection provides no convincing evidence of any treatment as definitively neuroprotective in Parkinson’s disease. Recent clinical trials and novel trial designs are reviewed that may identify meaningful therapy, resulting in maintenance of neurological function and quality of life for persons with Parkinson’s disease.

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has been implicated in the protection of dopamine (DA) neurons from oxidative stress in animal models of Parkinson’s disease (PD). We have now shown that GDNF can also protect against the effects of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) in a dopaminergic cell line and in cultures of primary DA neurons prepared from rat substantia nigra (SN). This appears to involve a rapid and transient increase in the phosphorylation of several isoforms of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Our evidence indicates that ERK activation also can be modulated by reactive oxygen species (ROS), including those generated by endogenous DA. Identification of the ways by which these pathways can be triggered should provide insights into the pathophysiology of PD, and may offer useful avenues for retarding the progression of the disorder.

Ladostigil is a novel drug that inhibits acetyl and butyrylcholinesterase, and monoamine oxidase (MAO) A and B selectively in the brain. It reverses memory deficits induced by chronic inhibition of cortical cytochrome oxidase in rats and has anxiolytic and antidepressant-like activity in prenatally-stressed rats. Ladostigil also prevents oxidative-nitrative stress induced in astrocytes in the hippocampal CA1 region following icv injection of STZ in rats which also impairs their episodic memory. The unique combination of ChE and MAO enzyme inhibition combined with neuroprotection makes ladostigil a potentially useful drug for the treatment of dementia in subjects that also have extrapyramidal dysfunction and depression.

Iron and monoamine oxidase activity are increased in brain of Parkinson’s disease (PD). They are associated with autoxidation and oxidative deamination of dopamine by MAO resulting in the generation of reactive oxygen species and the onset of oxidative stress to induce neurodegeneration. Iron chelators (desferal, Vk-28 and clioquinol) but not copper chelators have been shown to be neuroprotective in the 6-hydroxydoapmine and MPTP models of Parkinson’s disease (PD), as are monoamine oxidase B inhibitors such as selegiline and rasagiline. These findings prompted the development of multifunctional anti PD drugs possessing iron chelating phamacophore of VK-28 and the propargylamine MAO inhibitory activity of rasagiline. M30 is a potent iron chelator, radical scavenger and brain selective irreversible MAO-A and B inhibitor, with little inhibition of peripheral MAO. It has neuroprotective activity in in vitro and in vivo models of PD and unlike selective MAO-B inhibitors it increases brain dopamine, serotonin and noradrenaline. These findings indicate beside its anti PD action, it may also possess antidepressant activity, similar to selective MAO-A and nonselective MAO inhibitors. These properties make it an ideal anti PD drug for which it is being developed.

Our recent studies aimed to elucidate the molecular and biochemical mechanism of actions of the novel anti-Parkinson’s drug, rasagiline, an irreversible and selective monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B inhibitor and its propargyl moiety, propargylamine. In cell death models induced by serum withdrawal in rat PC12 cells and human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, both rasagiline and propargylamine exerted neuroprotective and neurorescue activities via multiple survival pathways, including: stimulation of protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation; up-regulation of protein and gene levels of PKCα, PKCɛ and the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w; and up-regulation of the neurotrophic factors, BDNF and GDNF mRNAs. Rasagiline and propargylamine inhibited the cleavage and subsequent activation of procaspase- 3 and poly ADP-ribose polymerase. Additionally, these compounds significantly down-regulated PKCγ mRNA and decreased the level of the pro-apoptotic proteins, Bax, Bad, Bim and H2A.X. Rasagiline and propargylamine both regulated amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing towards the nonamyloidogenic pathway. These structure-activity studies have provided evidence that propargylamine promoted neuronal survival via neuroprotective/neurorescue pathways similar to that of rasagiline. In addition, recent study demonstrated that chronic low doses of rasagiline administered to mice subsequently to 1 methyl–4 phenyl 1,2,3,6 tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), rescued dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta via activation of the Ras-PI3K-Akt survival pathway, suggesting that rasagiline may possess a disease modifying activity.

Apoptosis, whether caspase-dependent or caspase-independent, has been implicated as one of the important mechanisms leading to the death of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of Parkinson’s disease patients. Major advances of our understanding of apoptosis have been achieved in studies of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) toxicity in mice and monkeys and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) toxicity in rats and monkeys. The use of viral vectors to either express anti-apoptotic proteins or to downregulate pro-apoptotic proteins has the major advantage of addressing selective molecular targets, bypassing the blood-brain-barrier to specifically target the nigrostriatal pathway by their stereotaxic application and by the choice of the appropriate virus and promotor. Used thus far have been virus-mediated overexpression of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, inhibitors of the c-jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway, inhibitors of calpains and dominant negative inhibitors of the protease activating factor (APAF)-1 and cdk5. Most studies implicate the endogenous, mitochondrial pathway in the apoptosis of dopaminergic neurons. The results suggest that only an inhibition of this pathway upstream of caspase activation will also result in the protection of nigrostriatal dopaminergic terminals and behavioral benefit, whereas an inhibition of caspases alone may not be sufficient to prevent the degeneration of terminals, although it may promote the survival of neuronal cell bodies for some time.