Catálogo de publicaciones - libros

Compartir en
redes sociales


SCALING AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN ECOLOGY

JIANGUO WU ; K. BRUCE JONES ; HARBIN LI ; ORIE L. LOUCKS (eds.)

Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial

No disponible.

Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial

Ecology; Ecosystems; Landscape Ecology; Environmental Management; Nature Conservation

Disponibilidad
Institución detectada Año de publicación Navegá Descargá Solicitá
No detectada 2006 SpringerLink

Información

Tipo de recurso:

libros

ISBN impreso

978-1-4020-4662-9

ISBN electrónico

978-1-4020-4663-6

Editor responsable

Springer Nature

País de edición

Reino Unido

Fecha de publicación

Información sobre derechos de publicación

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Cobertura temática

Tabla de contenidos

MULTISCALE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS AND NITROGEN CONCENTRATIONS IN STREAMS

K. BRUCE JONES; Anne C. Neale; Timothy G. Wade; Chad L. Cross; James D. Wickham; Maliha S. Nash; Curtis M. Edmonds; Kurt H. Riitters; Robert V. O'Neill; Elizabeth R. Smith; Rick D. Van Remortel

The best way to understand a linear mixed model, or mixed linear model in some earlier literature, is to first recall a linear regression model. The latter can be expressed as = + , where is a vector of observations, is a matrix of known covariates, is a vector of unknown regression coefficients, and is a vector of (unobservable random) errors. In this model, the regression coefficients are considered fixed. However, there are cases in which it makes sense to assume that some of these coefficients are random. These cases typically occur when the observations are correlated. For example, in medical studies observations are often collected from the same individuals over time. It may be reasonable to assume that correlations exist among the observations from the same individual, especially if the times at which the observations are collected are relatively close. In animal breeding, lactation yields of dairy cows associated with the same sire may be correlated. In educational research, test scores of the same student may be related.

2 - PART II - CASE STUDIES | Pp. 205-224

UNCERTAINTY IN SCALING NUTRIENT EXPORT COEFFICIENTS

James D. Wickham; K. BRUCE JONES; Timothy G. Wade; Kurt H. Riitters

The best way to understand a linear mixed model, or mixed linear model in some earlier literature, is to first recall a linear regression model. The latter can be expressed as = + , where is a vector of observations, is a matrix of known covariates, is a vector of unknown regression coefficients, and is a vector of (unobservable random) errors. In this model, the regression coefficients are considered fixed. However, there are cases in which it makes sense to assume that some of these coefficients are random. These cases typically occur when the observations are correlated. For example, in medical studies observations are often collected from the same individuals over time. It may be reasonable to assume that correlations exist among the observations from the same individual, especially if the times at which the observations are collected are relatively close. In animal breeding, lactation yields of dairy cows associated with the same sire may be correlated. In educational research, test scores of the same student may be related.

2 - PART II - CASE STUDIES | Pp. 225-237

CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF LAND USE CHANGE IN THE NORTH CAROLINA PIEDMONT: THE SCOPE OF UNCERTAINTY

Dean L. Urban; Robert I. McDonald; Emily S. Minor; Eric A. Treml

The best way to understand a linear mixed model, or mixed linear model in some earlier literature, is to first recall a linear regression model. The latter can be expressed as = + , where is a vector of observations, is a matrix of known covariates, is a vector of unknown regression coefficients, and is a vector of (unobservable random) errors. In this model, the regression coefficients are considered fixed. However, there are cases in which it makes sense to assume that some of these coefficients are random. These cases typically occur when the observations are correlated. For example, in medical studies observations are often collected from the same individuals over time. It may be reasonable to assume that correlations exist among the observations from the same individual, especially if the times at which the observations are collected are relatively close. In animal breeding, lactation yields of dairy cows associated with the same sire may be correlated. In educational research, test scores of the same student may be related.

2 - PART II - CASE STUDIES | Pp. 239-257

ASSESSING THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL SCALE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AVIAN NESTING SUCCESS AND FOREST FRAGMENTATION

Penn Lloyd; Thomas E. Martin; Roland L. Redmond; Melissa M. Hart; Ute Langner; Ronald D. Bassar

The best way to understand a linear mixed model, or mixed linear model in some earlier literature, is to first recall a linear regression model. The latter can be expressed as = + , where is a vector of observations, is a matrix of known covariates, is a vector of unknown regression coefficients, and is a vector of (unobservable random) errors. In this model, the regression coefficients are considered fixed. However, there are cases in which it makes sense to assume that some of these coefficients are random. These cases typically occur when the observations are correlated. For example, in medical studies observations are often collected from the same individuals over time. It may be reasonable to assume that correlations exist among the observations from the same individual, especially if the times at which the observations are collected are relatively close. In animal breeding, lactation yields of dairy cows associated with the same sire may be correlated. In educational research, test scores of the same student may be related.

2 - PART II - CASE STUDIES | Pp. 259-273

SCALING ISSUES IN MAPPING RIPARIAN ZONES WITH REMOTE SENSING DATA: QUANTIFYING ERRORS AND SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY

Thomas P. Hollenhorst; George E. Host; Lucinda B. Johnson

The best way to understand a linear mixed model, or mixed linear model in some earlier literature, is to first recall a linear regression model. The latter can be expressed as = + , where is a vector of observations, is a matrix of known covariates, is a vector of unknown regression coefficients, and is a vector of (unobservable random) errors. In this model, the regression coefficients are considered fixed. However, there are cases in which it makes sense to assume that some of these coefficients are random. These cases typically occur when the observations are correlated. For example, in medical studies observations are often collected from the same individuals over time. It may be reasonable to assume that correlations exist among the observations from the same individual, especially if the times at which the observations are collected are relatively close. In animal breeding, lactation yields of dairy cows associated with the same sire may be correlated. In educational research, test scores of the same student may be related.

2 - PART II - CASE STUDIES | Pp. 275-295

SCALE ISSUES IN LAKE-WATERSHED INTERACTIONS: ASSESSING SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS ON WATER CLARITY

Carol A. Johnston; Boris A. Shmagin

The best way to understand a linear mixed model, or mixed linear model in some earlier literature, is to first recall a linear regression model. The latter can be expressed as = + , where is a vector of observations, is a matrix of known covariates, is a vector of unknown regression coefficients, and is a vector of (unobservable random) errors. In this model, the regression coefficients are considered fixed. However, there are cases in which it makes sense to assume that some of these coefficients are random. These cases typically occur when the observations are correlated. For example, in medical studies observations are often collected from the same individuals over time. It may be reasonable to assume that correlations exist among the observations from the same individual, especially if the times at which the observations are collected are relatively close. In animal breeding, lactation yields of dairy cows associated with the same sire may be correlated. In educational research, test scores of the same student may be related.

2 - PART II - CASE STUDIES | Pp. 297-313

SCALING AND UNCERTAINTY IN REGION-WIDE WATER QUALITY DECISION-MAKING

ORIE L. LOUCKS; Harry J. Stone; Bruce M. Kahn

The best way to understand a linear mixed model, or mixed linear model in some earlier literature, is to first recall a linear regression model. The latter can be expressed as = + , where is a vector of observations, is a matrix of known covariates, is a vector of unknown regression coefficients, and is a vector of (unobservable random) errors. In this model, the regression coefficients are considered fixed. However, there are cases in which it makes sense to assume that some of these coefficients are random. These cases typically occur when the observations are correlated. For example, in medical studies observations are often collected from the same individuals over time. It may be reasonable to assume that correlations exist among the observations from the same individual, especially if the times at which the observations are collected are relatively close. In animal breeding, lactation yields of dairy cows associated with the same sire may be correlated. In educational research, test scores of the same student may be related.

2 - PART II - CASE STUDIES | Pp. 315-325

SCALING WITH KNOWN UNCERTAINTY: A SYNTHESIS

JIANGUO WU; HARBIN LI; K. BRUCE JONES; ORIE L. LOUCKS

The best way to understand a linear mixed model, or mixed linear model in some earlier literature, is to first recall a linear regression model. The latter can be expressed as = + , where is a vector of observations, is a matrix of known covariates, is a vector of unknown regression coefficients, and is a vector of (unobservable random) errors. In this model, the regression coefficients are considered fixed. However, there are cases in which it makes sense to assume that some of these coefficients are random. These cases typically occur when the observations are correlated. For example, in medical studies observations are often collected from the same individuals over time. It may be reasonable to assume that correlations exist among the observations from the same individual, especially if the times at which the observations are collected are relatively close. In animal breeding, lactation yields of dairy cows associated with the same sire may be correlated. In educational research, test scores of the same student may be related.

3 - PART III - SYNTHESIS | Pp. 329-346