Catálogo de publicaciones - libros

Over two decades ago, the electrostimulation of the trigeminal ganglion (TGES) was established as a treatment option for patients with trigem-inopathic pain due to a (iatrogenic) lesion of the trigeminal nerve, on whom the other therapeutic methods, either neurosurgical or conservative have very limited efficacy and usually are associated with a poor outcome. The technique of TGES which uses the setup also used for the thermocoagulation lesion for trigeminal neuralgia was first published by Steude in 1984 and has not been altered substantially. After a percutaneous puncture with a 16 gage needle of the oval foramen, a monopolar electrode (diameter 0.9mm, custom-made) is placed in the postganglionic trigeminal nerve. After a successful test-stimulation phase, a permanent electrode pulse generator system is implanted. Our experience includes more than 300 patients with a minimum follow-up of one year. Of these patients, 52% showed a good to excellent analgesic effect. The TGES-induced analgesia was persistent in long term-followup in all patients. The impact of TGES on cerebral pain modulation was proven by electrophysiology and PET. TGES is an effective, minimally invasive and reversible treatment option in selected patients with trigeminopathic pain; it should, therefore, always be considered as the primary treatment-option. Electrodes with two leads and a diameter not exceeding the 0.9mm, allowing bipolar stimulation might enhance the neuromodulatory efficacy and options of TGES.

The trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) are a group of primary headache syndromes characterised by intense pain and associated activation of cranial parasympathetic autonomic outflow pathways out of proportion to the pain. The TACs include cluster headache, paroxysmal hemicrania and SUNCT (short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing). The pathophysiology of these syndromes involves activation of the trigeminal-autonomic reflex, whose afferent limb projects into the trigeminocervical complex in the caudal brainstem and upper cervical spinal cord. Functional brain imaging has shown activations in the posterior hypothalamic grey matter in TACs. This paper reviews the anatomy and physiology of these conditions and the brain imaging findings. Current treatments are summarised and the role of neuromodulation procedures, such as occipital nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation in the posterior hypothalamus are reviewed. Neuromodulatory procedures are a promising avenue for these highly disabled patients with treatment refractory TACs.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for pain was one of the earliest indications for the therapy. This study reports the outcome of DBS of the sensory thalamus and the periventricular and peri-aqueductal grey area (PVG=PAG) complex for different intractable neuropathic pain syndromes. Forty-seven patients (30 males and 17 females) were selected for surgery; they were suffering from any of the following types of pain: post-stroke neuropathic pain, phantom limb pain, post-herpetic neuralgia, anaesthesia dolorosa, brachial plexus injury and neuropathic pain secondary to neural damage from a variety of causes. Of the 47 patients selected for trial stimulation, 38 patients proceeded to permanent implantation. Patients suffering from post-stroke pain were the most likely to fail trial stimulation (33%), in contrast to individuals with phantom limb=post-brachial plexus injury pain and anaesthesia dolorosa, all of whom underwent permanent implantation. PVG stimulation alone was optimal in 17 patients (53%), whilst a combination of PVG and thalamic stimulation produced the greatest degree of analgesia in 11 patients (34%). Thalamic stimulation alone was optimal in 4 patients (13%). DBS of the PVG alone was associated with the highest degree of pain alleviation, with a mean improvement of 59% (<0.001) and a ≥50% improvement in 66% of patients. Post-stroke pain responds in 70% of patients. We conclude that the outcomes of surgery appear to vary according to aetiology, but it would appear that the effects are best for phantom limb syndromes, head pain and anaesthesia dolorosa.

Surgical therapy for movement disorders has been practiced since the early 20th century, mostly for Parkinson’s disease. At its onset, large destructive procedures like open resection of cortex, parts of the basal ganglia or its fibre connections produced variable, ill-documented results. With the introduction of the stereotactic operating technique in the second half of the century, ablative surgery became more refined, and more selective interventions became possible to alleviate the suffering of those patients for whom no other treatment modalities were yet available. However, the introduction of levodopa-based pharmacological therapy pushed surgical therapy almost completely to the background.

In the past two decades, there has been a resurgence of interest in surgery for movement disorders, due to both limitations of long-term pharmacological therapy and the advent of the treatment modality of deep brain stimulation. The subject has now grown into a large field of clinical and scientific interest. Parkinson’s disease is the most widespread surgical indication, but in other movement disorders considerable improvement can be achieved by surgery as well, most notably in dystonia. A short review of the surgical therapy for these disorders is presented.

During the last decade there has been a marked increase in the applications of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. In addition, the last years were marked by the first studies using the intraparenchymal administration of drugs into the brain. There have been improvements in outcome and an increase in the number of surgical candidates and conditions to be treated. This will act as a driving force to improve the technology applied to design and manufacture new devices.

The mainstays of Parkinson’s disease (PD) treatment remain symptomatic, including initial dopamine replacement and subsequent deep brain stimulation, however, neither of these approaches is neuroprotective. Neurotrophic factors — proteins that activate cell signalling pathways regulating neuronal survival, differentiation, growth and regeneration — represent an alternative for treating dopaminergic neurons in PD but are difficult to administer clinically because they do not pass through the blood-brain barrier. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has potent neurotrophic effects particularly but not exclusively on dopaminergic neurons; in animal models of PD, it has consistently demonstrated both neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effects when provided continuously, either by means of a viral vector or through continuous infusion either into the cerebral ventricles (ICV) or directly into the denervated putamen. This led to a human PD study in which GDNF was administered by monthly bolus intracerebroventricular injections, however, no clinical benefit resulted, probably because of the limited penetration to the target brain areas, and instead significant side effects occurred. In an open-label study of continuous intraputamenal GDNF infusion in five patients (one unilaterally and four bilaterally), we reported excellent tolerance, few side effects and clinical benefit evident within three months of the commencement of treatment. The clinical improvement was sustained and progressive, and by 24-months patients demonstrated a 57 and 63% improvement in their off-medication motor and activities of daily living UPDRS subscores, respectively, with clear benefit in dyskinesias. The benefit was associated with a significant increase in putamenal F-dopa uptake on positron emission tomography (PET), and in one patient coming to autopsy after 43 months of unilateral infusion there was evident increased tyrosine hydroxylase immunopositive nerve fibres in the infused putamen. A second open trial in 10 patients using unilateral intraputamenal GDNF infusions has also demonstrated a greater than 30% bilateral benefit in both on- and off-medication scores at 24 weeks. Based on our 6-month results, a randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to confirm the open-label results, however, GDNF infusion over 6-months did not confer the predetermined level of clinical benefit to patients with PD despite increased F-dopa uptake surrounding the catheter tip. It is possible that technical differences between this trial and the positive open label studies contributed to this negative outcome.

The basal ganglia constitute parts of highly sophisticated and complex neuronal networks, which represent essential elements of functional circuits, actively involved in the control of movement. The physiologic properties of these networks and their interchange with different brain areas could serve as a model for the pathophysiologic explanation of various movement disorders, particularly Parkinson’s disease. Stimulation of these networks and subsequent recording of the evoked Local Field Potentials is currently used not only for understanding the pathophysiology of movement disorders but also for the physiologic localization of the anatomical target during deep brain stimulation procedures. An overview of the currently available research and clinical data from the recording of Local Field Potentials as well as the advantages, the disadvantages and the limitations of this methodology are presented in this chapter.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents one of the more recent advancements in Neurosurgery. Even though its most successful applications evolved in movement disorders (MDs), indications now include pain, psychiatric disorders, epilepsy, cluster headaches and Tourette syndrome. As this type of surgery gains popularity and the indications for DBS surgery increase, so it will certainly increase the number of neurosurgeons who will use this neuromodulatory technique. A detailed description of the technical aspects of the DBS procedure, as it is performed in our department, is presented. In our opinion, our method is a good combination of all the well-established necessary techniques in a cost-effective way. This technical article may be helpful to neurosurgeons considering to start performing this type of surgery. It could also prompt others who perform DBS regularly to express their views, and hence, lead to further refinement of this demanding procedure.

Indications for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) with deep brain stimulation (DBS) are severe, therapy refractory tremor and complications of long-term levodopa uptake. Since its first application DBS has become a standard therapy for these patients. Theoretically, the ventrolateral part of the internal pallidum (GPI) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN) are suitable targets in order to treat all cardinal symptoms of patients in an advanced stage of PD stereotactically. Although clinical efficacy of both GPI or STN stimulation is obviously comparable, it has become widely accepted to prefer STN over GPI DBS. If PD-associated, medically intractable tremor is the most disabling symptom, stimulation of the ventrolateral motor thalamus can be an alternative. Anatomical targets for DBS are small and located in critical brain areas. Furthermore, this type of surgery is highly elective. As a consequence, high resolution multiplanar imaging and adequate treatment planning software are indispensable prerequisites for DBS surgery. Currently, commercially available impulse generators deliver a permanent high frequency periodic pulse train stimulation that interacts rather unspecifically with the firing pattern of both normal and pathological neurons. Prospectively, the development of more specific stimulation paradigms may help to improve the efficacy of this treatment modality.

In patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), tetrapolar electrodes were implanted in the prelemniscal radiations (RAPRL) to treat tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia. Fifteen patients were implanted unilaterally and five patients bilaterally and followed-up for one year. The selection criteria included the presence of unilateral pronounced tremor and rigidity in patients implanted unilaterally or bilateral symptoms including severe bradykinesia in patients implanted bilaterally. In the operating room, the tremor decreased significantly or was abolished following the insertion of the electrode in the RAPRL. This effect was temporary and subsided when the stimulation was off. However, when the stimulator was turned on, the severity of the symptoms and signs decreased significantly. The post-implantation MRI confirmed that the electrode contacts used for stimulation were inserted in RAPRL, a group of fibers located between the red nucleus and subthalamic nucleus, above the substantia nigra, medially to the zona incerta and below the thalamus. The patients were evaluated using the UPDRS part III, before implantation and every 3 months during the first year. Global scores decreased significantly. The pre- and postoperative median values (range in round brackets) were as follows: tremor improved from 3 (2–16) to 1 (2–3) (<0.001); rigidity was either abolished or decreased markedly from 2 (1–16) to 0 (0–4) (<0.001); bradykinesia improved from 2 (0–4) to 1 (0–2) (<0.001). We conclude that RAPRL, an area anatomically different from STN, is a good target for electrical stimulation in order to treat effectively all the main symptoms of PD.