Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas
Título de Acceso Abierto
Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial
No disponible.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
scholarship of teaching and learning; students
Disponibilidad
Institución detectada | Período | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
---|---|---|---|---|
No requiere | desde nov. 2024 / hasta nov. 2024 | Directory of Open Access Journals | ||
No requiere | desde ene. 2013 / hasta jul. 2015 | JSTOR |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
revistas
ISSN impreso
2167-4779
ISSN electrónico
2167-4787
Idiomas de la publicación
- inglés
País de edición
Canadá
Información sobre licencias CC
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
Participatory and Place-Based Socioeconomic Knowledge Generation: An Experience in Community-Based Research Pedagogy
Jessica Palka
<jats:p>This article uses fieldnotes along with student and practitioner feedback to recount the challenges, benefits, and broader learnings of engaging master’s students in a participatory research seminar. The students developed research proposals about a real-world socioeconomic challenge with and for local practitioners. Proposals were consistent with the principles and practices of participatory action research (PAR). The planning, implementation, and assessment of this course was informed by feminist scientific philosophies of collaboration, situatedness, partiality, accountability, and a sensitivity to power dynamics. In line with both PAR and SoTL principles, there was an explicit emphasis on partnership, reflexivity, and broad forms of learning in both the classroom and practitioner meetings. The students were challenged by the unfamiliarity of the research approach, the need to navigate a new way of working directly with stakeholders, as well as the responsibility to the community that participatory approaches espouse. Despite the challenges, the students were eager to soak up local knowledges, reflect on their role as researchers, and contribute constructively if they could.</jats:p>
Palabras clave: Education.
Pp. No disponible
Using Infographics to Go Public with SoTL
Bryn Keogh; Lorelli Nowell; Eleftheria Laios; Lisa McKendrick-Calder; Whitney Lucas Molitor; Kerry Wilbur
<jats:p>There has been a call to amplify the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) and expand its reach by engaging with audiences outside the academy. In this paper, we share our journey in crossing disciplinary boundaries and creating a SoTL-informed infographic for public consumption. As the field of SoTL continues to evolve, infographics hold tremendous potential to communicate SoTL to various stakeholders, including educators, students, administrators, policymakers, and the public. We outline best practices in infographic development and the potential of infographics as a tool for taking SoTL public, emphasizing their visual appeal and effectiveness in conveying complex information. We conclude by discussing the implications of using infographics to advance SoTL communication. The efforts of our group serve as a valuable example of how infographics can be used to bring SoTL knowledge out of academia and into the public domain.</jats:p>
Palabras clave: Education.
Pp. No disponible
Defining Immersive Learning
Phillip Motley; Beth Archer-Kuhn; Catharine Dishke Hondzel; Jennifer Dobbs-Oates; Michelle Eady; Janel Seeley; Rosemary Tyrrell
<jats:p>Immersive learning practices (ILPs) in higher education are multidisciplinary in nature and varied in levels of integration into the student learning process. They appear in a variety of higher education programs such as teacher education, social work, law, and health sciences, and in practices such as service-learning, study away, internships, and foreign-language instruction. Based on observations of teaching and data from an open-ended survey and semi-structured interviews with post-secondary educators from three different countries, this study theorizes that immersive learning practices are composed of six distinct underlying theoretical components that work in combination. These six components can be used to describe, define, compare, and design different types of structured ILPs. This study suggests that ILPs are pedagogically distinct from other forms of engaged and experiential learning.</jats:p>
Palabras clave: Education.
Pp. No disponible