Catálogo de publicaciones - libros
Regular Expression Recipes for Windows Developers: A Problem-Solution Approach
Nathan A. Good
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial
No disponible.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
Microsoft and .NET; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems
Disponibilidad
Institución detectada | Año de publicación | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
---|---|---|---|---|
No detectada | 2005 | SpringerLink |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
libros
ISBN impreso
978-1-59059-497-1
ISBN electrónico
978-1-4302-0028-4
Editor responsable
Springer Nature
País de edición
Reino Unido
Fecha de publicación
2005
Información sobre derechos de publicación
© Nathan Good 2005
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
Words and Text
Nathan A. Good
As far as this book is concerned, one of Italy’s most famous painters and great masters, Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), presents a serious problem. On the one hand he was too important a thinker to be ignored, and on the other hand his ideas on perspective were so many — and often so perplexing — that a thorough presentation would require a much longer study than can be included here. Fortunately, many facets of Leonardo and perspective have already been discussed by competent historians. Keeping the extensive literature and the complications in mind, I have decided to be relatively brief on Leonardo with the somewhat blunt argument that in general his thoughts on perspective only became known after the period I consider here, hence exerting very little influence on developments. In fact, had his ideas been known, he would have contributed much more to raising doubts about perspective than to creating a mathematical understanding of the subject.
Pp. 1-90
URLs and Paths
Nathan A. Good
As far as this book is concerned, one of Italy’s most famous painters and great masters, Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), presents a serious problem. On the one hand he was too important a thinker to be ignored, and on the other hand his ideas on perspective were so many — and often so perplexing — that a thorough presentation would require a much longer study than can be included here. Fortunately, many facets of Leonardo and perspective have already been discussed by competent historians. Keeping the extensive literature and the complications in mind, I have decided to be relatively brief on Leonardo with the somewhat blunt argument that in general his thoughts on perspective only became known after the period I consider here, hence exerting very little influence on developments. In fact, had his ideas been known, he would have contributed much more to raising doubts about perspective than to creating a mathematical understanding of the subject.
Pp. 91-125
CSV and Tab-Delimited Files
Nathan A. Good
As far as this book is concerned, one of Italy’s most famous painters and great masters, Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), presents a serious problem. On the one hand he was too important a thinker to be ignored, and on the other hand his ideas on perspective were so many — and often so perplexing — that a thorough presentation would require a much longer study than can be included here. Fortunately, many facets of Leonardo and perspective have already been discussed by competent historians. Keeping the extensive literature and the complications in mind, I have decided to be relatively brief on Leonardo with the somewhat blunt argument that in general his thoughts on perspective only became known after the period I consider here, hence exerting very little influence on developments. In fact, had his ideas been known, he would have contributed much more to raising doubts about perspective than to creating a mathematical understanding of the subject.
Pp. 127-154
Formatting and Validating
Nathan A. Good
As far as this book is concerned, one of Italy’s most famous painters and great masters, Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), presents a serious problem. On the one hand he was too important a thinker to be ignored, and on the other hand his ideas on perspective were so many — and often so perplexing — that a thorough presentation would require a much longer study than can be included here. Fortunately, many facets of Leonardo and perspective have already been discussed by competent historians. Keeping the extensive literature and the complications in mind, I have decided to be relatively brief on Leonardo with the somewhat blunt argument that in general his thoughts on perspective only became known after the period I consider here, hence exerting very little influence on developments. In fact, had his ideas been known, he would have contributed much more to raising doubts about perspective than to creating a mathematical understanding of the subject.
Pp. 155-241
HTML and XML
Nathan A. Good
As far as this book is concerned, one of Italy’s most famous painters and great masters, Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), presents a serious problem. On the one hand he was too important a thinker to be ignored, and on the other hand his ideas on perspective were so many — and often so perplexing — that a thorough presentation would require a much longer study than can be included here. Fortunately, many facets of Leonardo and perspective have already been discussed by competent historians. Keeping the extensive literature and the complications in mind, I have decided to be relatively brief on Leonardo with the somewhat blunt argument that in general his thoughts on perspective only became known after the period I consider here, hence exerting very little influence on developments. In fact, had his ideas been known, he would have contributed much more to raising doubts about perspective than to creating a mathematical understanding of the subject.
Pp. 243-270
Source Code
Nathan A. Good
As far as this book is concerned, one of Italy’s most famous painters and great masters, Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), presents a serious problem. On the one hand he was too important a thinker to be ignored, and on the other hand his ideas on perspective were so many — and often so perplexing — that a thorough presentation would require a much longer study than can be included here. Fortunately, many facets of Leonardo and perspective have already been discussed by competent historians. Keeping the extensive literature and the complications in mind, I have decided to be relatively brief on Leonardo with the somewhat blunt argument that in general his thoughts on perspective only became known after the period I consider here, hence exerting very little influence on developments. In fact, had his ideas been known, he would have contributed much more to raising doubts about perspective than to creating a mathematical understanding of the subject.
Pp. 271-356