Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas

Compartir en
redes sociales


Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial

No disponible.

Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial

No disponibles.

Disponibilidad
Institución detectada Período Navegá Descargá Solicitá
No detectada desde ene. 1999 / hasta dic. 2023 Wiley Online Library

Información

Tipo de recurso:

revistas

ISSN impreso

1523-0899

ISSN electrónico

1708-8208

País de edición

Estados Unidos

Cobertura temática

Tabla de contenidos

Unraveling the effectiveness of antibiotics for peri‐implantitis treatment: A scoping review

Magda FeresORCID; Rodrigo Martins; João Gabriel S. SouzaORCID; Martinna Bertolini; Valentim A. R. BarãoORCID; Jamil A. ShibliORCID

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Antibiotics are the most effective adjuncts in the treatment of periodontitis. However, the benefits of these agents in treating peri‐implantitis are still debatable and demand further analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this review was to critically appraise the literature on the use of antibiotics to treat peri‐implantitis, with the ultimate goal of supporting evidence‐based clinical recommendations, defining gaps in knowledge and guiding future studies on this topic.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>A systematized literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on patients with peri‐implantitis treated by mechanical debridement‐only or with adjunctive use of local or systemic antibiotics. Clinical and microbiological data were extracted from the RCTs included. The findings were critically reviewed, interpreted, and discussed. An overview of antibiotic‐loaded dental implant materials in peri‐implantitis treatment was also provided.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Twelve RCTs testing local/systemic antibiotics were included. Although not always statistically significant, all antibiotic‐treated groups had greater reductions in mean PD than those treated by mechanical debridement‐only. The only clinically relevant antibiotic protocol supported by one RCT with low risk of bias and long‐lasting benefits was systemic metronidazole (MTZ). Studies using ultrasonic debridement reported better outcomes. No RCTs to date have tested MTZ‐only or with amoxicillin (AMX) as adjuncts to open‐flap implant debridement. In vitro/animal studies suggested that biomaterials with antimicrobial properties are promising to treat peri‐implantitis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>There are insufficient data to support a particular evidence‐based antibiotic protocol to treat peri‐implantitis using surgical or nonsurgical therapy, but some conclusions may be drawn. Systemic MTZ adjunct to ultrasonic debridement is an effective protocol to improve the outcomes of nonsurgical treatment. Future studies should assess the clinical and microbiological effects of MTZ and MTZ + AMX as adjuncts to optimal nonsurgical implant decontamination protocols or open‐flap debridement. In addition, new locally delivered drugs and antibiotic‐loaded surfaces should be assessed by RCTs.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Pp. 767-781