Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial
No disponible.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
No disponibles.
Disponibilidad
Institución detectada | Período | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
---|---|---|---|---|
No detectada | desde ene. 1999 / hasta dic. 2023 | Wiley Online Library |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
revistas
ISSN impreso
1523-0899
ISSN electrónico
1708-8208
País de edición
Estados Unidos
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
doi: 10.1111/cid.13239
Unraveling the effectiveness of antibiotics for peri‐implantitis treatment: A scoping review
Magda Feres; Rodrigo Martins; João Gabriel S. Souza; Martinna Bertolini; Valentim A. R. Barão; Jamil A. Shibli
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Antibiotics are the most effective adjuncts in the treatment of periodontitis. However, the benefits of these agents in treating peri‐implantitis are still debatable and demand further analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this review was to critically appraise the literature on the use of antibiotics to treat peri‐implantitis, with the ultimate goal of supporting evidence‐based clinical recommendations, defining gaps in knowledge and guiding future studies on this topic.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>A systematized literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on patients with peri‐implantitis treated by mechanical debridement‐only or with adjunctive use of local or systemic antibiotics. Clinical and microbiological data were extracted from the RCTs included. The findings were critically reviewed, interpreted, and discussed. An overview of antibiotic‐loaded dental implant materials in peri‐implantitis treatment was also provided.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Twelve RCTs testing local/systemic antibiotics were included. Although not always statistically significant, all antibiotic‐treated groups had greater reductions in mean PD than those treated by mechanical debridement‐only. The only clinically relevant antibiotic protocol supported by one RCT with low risk of bias and long‐lasting benefits was systemic metronidazole (MTZ). Studies using ultrasonic debridement reported better outcomes. No RCTs to date have tested MTZ‐only or with amoxicillin (AMX) as adjuncts to open‐flap implant debridement. In vitro/animal studies suggested that biomaterials with antimicrobial properties are promising to treat peri‐implantitis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>There are insufficient data to support a particular evidence‐based antibiotic protocol to treat peri‐implantitis using surgical or nonsurgical therapy, but some conclusions may be drawn. Systemic MTZ adjunct to ultrasonic debridement is an effective protocol to improve the outcomes of nonsurgical treatment. Future studies should assess the clinical and microbiological effects of MTZ and MTZ + AMX as adjuncts to optimal nonsurgical implant decontamination protocols or open‐flap debridement. In addition, new locally delivered drugs and antibiotic‐loaded surfaces should be assessed by RCTs.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Pp. 767-781