Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas
Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial
No disponible.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
No disponibles.
Disponibilidad
Institución detectada | Período | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
---|---|---|---|---|
No detectada | desde ene. 1992 / hasta dic. 2023 | Wiley Online Library |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
revistas
ISSN impreso
1060-1538
ISSN electrónico
1520-6505
País de edición
Estados Unidos
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
doi: 10.1002/evan.21480
What moves us? How mobility and movement are at the center of human evolution
Steven L. Kuhn; David A. Raichlen; Amy E. Clark
<jats:p>Movement is central to the survival of all free‐living organisms. Consequently, movement and what anthropologists often refer to as mobility, which is the sum of small‐scale movements tracked across larger geographic and temporal scales, are key targets of selection. Movement and mobility also underpin many of the key features that make us human and that allowed our lineage to adapt to changing environments across the globe. The most obvious example is the evolution of humans' singular mode of locomotion. Bipedalism is arguably the most important derived anatomical trait of the hominin lineage. The mechanisms and circumstances that gave rise to this novel mode of movement remain subjects of intense research.</jats:p>
Pp. 86-97
doi: 10.1002/evan.21858
Underestimating Kanzi? Exploring Kanzi‐Oldowan comparisons in light of recent human stone tool replication
Metin I. Eren; Stephen J. Lycett; Masaki Tomonaga
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The knapping experiments with Kanzi, a bonobo, are among the most insightful experiments into Oldowan technology ever undertaken. Comparison of his artifacts against archeological material, however, indicated he did not produce Oldowan lithic attributes precisely, prompting suggestions that this indicated cognitive or biomechanical impediments. The literature describing the learning environment provided to Kanzi, we suggest, indicates alternative factors. Based on consideration of wild chimpanzee learning environments, and experiments with modern knappers that have looked at learning environment, we contend that Kanzi's performance was impeded by an impoverished learning environment compared to those experienced by novice Oldowan knappers. Such issues are precisely those that might be tested via a repeat study, but in this case, practical and ethical constraints likely impede this possibility. We propose experiments that may be relevant to drawing conclusions from Kanzi's experiments that may not need to use non‐human primates, thus bypassing some of these issues.</jats:p>
Palabras clave: Anthropology; General Medicine.
Pp. 310-316