Catálogo de publicaciones - tesis
Título de Acceso Abierto
Control judicial de constitucionalidad en el proceso administrativo
Luis Alberto De Mattia Alejandro Dalmacio Andrada Rodolfo Luis Vigo Enrique José Marchiaro Maximiliano Torricelli
acceptedVersion.
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por el repositorio digital
The present thesis is devoted to the Judicial Review of Constitutionality in the Administrative Process and starts from the commitment assigned to the Rule-of-Law State in protecting subjective rights that are violated by illegal and illegitimate de facto actions of state and equally restoring those rights to juridical individuals through adjudication. Its significance distinguishes among parliamentary, concentrated and dispersed systems, thus facing, in Administrative Law, the application of unconstitutional norms and its effects, which are translated into general acts or regulations. In Argentina’s dispersed system, the theory of minimal decision-making, the theory of precedents, or the principle of iura novit curiae are held without complying with that commitment, which leads to the search for coadjuvant elements in doctrinal law and law-related disciplinary sources. This referring introduces a notion of Juridical Science as a method or the thinking of law as an epistemic subject to reach the juridical and constitutional principle of legality, thus exhibiting the inseparability of judicial decision and constitutional review, systems and other institutions that contain it. Likewise, it exhibits the scope of review and administrative procedure, and of the administrative judicial process, as well as extra-party or intra-party effects implied in the declaration of unconstitutionality. Thus, with that object that is compatible with the ethicity arising from the democratic and republican system, the postulation aims at reducing the complexity of procedure at the Administration and incorporating extra-party effects into nullifying sentences of general regulations, admitting the defense of third parties to guarantee equality and access to jurisdiction.Palabras clave – provistas por el repositorio digital
Constitutionality review; Rule-of-Law State; Parliamentary, Concentrated and Dispersed Systems; Administrative law; Illegal and illegitimate de facto actions of state; Judicial process; Control de constitucionalidad; Estado de Derecho; Sistemas Parlamentario, Concentrado y Difuso; Derecho administrativo; Actos estatales de facto, ilegales e ilegítimos; Proceso judicial
Disponibilidad
| Institución detectada | Año de publicación | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No requiere | 2015 | Biblioteca Virtual de la Universidad Nacional del Litoral (SNRD) |
|
Información
Tipo de recurso:
tesis
Idiomas de la publicación
- español castellano
País de edición
Argentina
Fecha de publicación
2015-05-21
