Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas
Comparative Political Studies
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial en inglés
Comparative Political Studies (CPS), published fourteen times a year, offers scholarly work on comparative politics at both the cross-national and intra-national levels. Dedicated to relevant, in-depth analyses, CPS provides the timeliest methodology, theory, and research in the field of comparative politics. Journal articles discuss innovative work on comparative methodology, theory, and research from around the world with important implications for the formation of domestic and foreign policies.Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
No disponibles.
Disponibilidad
Institución detectada | Período | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
---|---|---|---|---|
No detectada | desde feb. 1999 / hasta dic. 2023 | SAGE Journals |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
revistas
ISSN impreso
0010-4140
ISSN electrónico
1552-3829
Editor responsable
SAGE Publishing (SAGE)
País de edición
Estados Unidos
Fecha de publicación
1968-
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
Imperfect Recall: The Politics of Subnational Office Removals
Alisha C. Holland; José Incio
<jats:p> Why do some citizens remove the same politicians that they elected from office? This article examines the use of recall referenda, an increasingly prevalent process in which citizens organize a vote to remove politicians from office before they complete their terms. Although celebrated as a tool to improve electoral accountability, we argue that recall referenda are organized to pursue political vendettas. We test this claim using an original data set on the different stages leading to subnational recalls in Peru. Recalls are initiated more often when politicians lose by narrow vote margins and when women hold office. Once put to a vote, citizens do use office performance to decide whether to retain their politicians. Losing politicians organized fewer recall referenda following an institutional reform that allowed politicians to name their successors. The implication is that recall referenda create weak incentives to improve office performance, but careful institutional design can improve their functioning. </jats:p>
Pp. 777-805
Why Monarchy? The Rise and Demise of a Regime Type
John Gerring
; Tore Wig
; Wouter Veenendaal; Daniel Weitzel; Jan Teorell
; Kyosuke Kikuta
<jats:p> Monarchy was the dominant form of rule in the pre-modern era and it persists in a handful of countries. We propose a unified theoretical explanation for its rise and decline. Specifically, we argue that monarchy offers an efficient solution to the primordial problem of order where societies are large and citizens isolated from each other and hence have difficulty coordinating. Its efficiency is challenged by other methods of leadership selection when communication costs decline, lowering barriers to citizen coordination. This explains its dominance in the pre-modern world and its subsequent demise. To test this theory, we produce an original dataset that codes monarchies and republics in Europe (back to 1100) and the world (back to 1700). With this dataset, we test a number of observable implications of the theory—centering on territory size, political stability, tenure in office, conflict, and the role of mass communications in the modern era. </jats:p>
Palabras clave: Sociology and Political Science.
Pp. 585-622