Catálogo de publicaciones - libros

Compartir en
redes sociales


EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery: Twelve Years Evidence-Based Surgery in Europe

E.A.M. Neugebauer ; S. Sauerland ; A. Fingerhut ; B. Millat ; G. Buess (eds.)

Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial

No disponible.

Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial

Surgery; Abdominal Surgery; Traumatic Surgery; Gynecology; Imaging / Radiology

Disponibilidad
Institución detectada Año de publicación Navegá Descargá Solicitá
No detectada 2006 SpringerLink

Información

Tipo de recurso:

libros

ISBN impreso

978-3-540-32783-7

ISBN electrónico

978-3-540-32784-4

Editor responsable

Springer Nature

País de edición

Reino Unido

Fecha de publicación

Información sobre derechos de publicación

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Tabla de contenidos

The EAES Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Evaluation of Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Surgery (2004)

Dragan Korolija; Stefan Sauerland; Sharon Wood-Dauphinée; Claude C. Abbou; Ernst Eypasch; Manuel García Caballero; Mary A. Lumsden; Bertrand Millat; John R.T. Monson; Gunilla Nilsson; Rudolf Pointner; Wolfgang Schwenk; Andreas Shamiyeh; Amir Szold; Emilio Targarona; Benno Ure; Edmund A.M. Neugebauer

In reputation-based peer-to-peer systems, reputation is used to build trust between peers and help selecting the right peers to download from. In this paper, we argue that reputation should not be used for service differentiation among the peers. To provide the right incentives for peers to share files and contribute to the system, the new concept of is introduced for partially decentralized peer-to-peer systems. Service differentiation is achieved based on the of the peers rather than their reputations. Simulation results assess the ability of the proposed algorithm to effectively identify free riders and malicious peers that upload malicious content, hence reducing the level of service provided to these peers and preserving network resources. On the other hand, good peers that contribute to the system receive better services which increases their satisfaction significantly.

Pp. 1-38

The EAES Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Pneumoperitoneum for Laparoscopic Surgery (2002)

Jens Neudecker; Stefan Sauerland; Edmund A.M. Neugebauer; Roberto Bergamaschi; H.Jaap Bonjer; Alfred Cuschieri; Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Christoph A. Jacobi; F.W. Jansen; A.-M. Koivusalo; Antonio M. Lacy; M.J. McMahon; Bertrand Millat; Wolfgang Schwenk

In reputation-based peer-to-peer systems, reputation is used to build trust between peers and help selecting the right peers to download from. In this paper, we argue that reputation should not be used for service differentiation among the peers. To provide the right incentives for peers to share files and contribute to the system, the new concept of is introduced for partially decentralized peer-to-peer systems. Service differentiation is achieved based on the of the peers rather than their reputations. Simulation results assess the ability of the proposed algorithm to effectively identify free riders and malicious peers that upload malicious content, hence reducing the level of service provided to these peers and preserving network resources. On the other hand, good peers that contribute to the system receive better services which increases their satisfaction significantly.

Pp. 39-85

Pneumoperitoneum – Update 2006

Ann-Cathrin Moberg; Agneta Montgomery

In reputation-based peer-to-peer systems, reputation is used to build trust between peers and help selecting the right peers to download from. In this paper, we argue that reputation should not be used for service differentiation among the peers. To provide the right incentives for peers to share files and contribute to the system, the new concept of is introduced for partially decentralized peer-to-peer systems. Service differentiation is achieved based on the of the peers rather than their reputations. Simulation results assess the ability of the proposed algorithm to effectively identify free riders and malicious peers that upload malicious content, hence reducing the level of service provided to these peers and preserving network resources. On the other hand, good peers that contribute to the system receive better services which increases their satisfaction significantly.

Pp. 87-95

The EAES Clinical Practice Guidelines on Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery for Gastroesophagel Reflux Disease (1997)

Ernst Eypasch; Edmund A.M. Neugebauer; F. Fischer; Hans Troidl; A.L. Blum; D. Collet; A. Cuschieri; B. Dallemagne; H. Feussner; K.-H. Fuchs; H. Glise; C.K. Kum; T. Lerut; L. Lundell; H.E. Myrvold; A. Peracchia; H. Petersen; J.J.B. van Lanschot

In reputation-based peer-to-peer systems, reputation is used to build trust between peers and help selecting the right peers to download from. In this paper, we argue that reputation should not be used for service differentiation among the peers. To provide the right incentives for peers to share files and contribute to the system, the new concept of is introduced for partially decentralized peer-to-peer systems. Service differentiation is achieved based on the of the peers rather than their reputations. Simulation results assess the ability of the proposed algorithm to effectively identify free riders and malicious peers that upload malicious content, hence reducing the level of service provided to these peers and preserving network resources. On the other hand, good peers that contribute to the system receive better services which increases their satisfaction significantly.

Pp. 97-124

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease – Update 2006

Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Ernst Eypasch

In reputation-based peer-to-peer systems, reputation is used to build trust between peers and help selecting the right peers to download from. In this paper, we argue that reputation should not be used for service differentiation among the peers. To provide the right incentives for peers to share files and contribute to the system, the new concept of is introduced for partially decentralized peer-to-peer systems. Service differentiation is achieved based on the of the peers rather than their reputations. Simulation results assess the ability of the proposed algorithm to effectively identify free riders and malicious peers that upload malicious content, hence reducing the level of service provided to these peers and preserving network resources. On the other hand, good peers that contribute to the system receive better services which increases their satisfaction significantly.

Pp. 125-142

The EAES Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diverticular Disease (1999)

Lothar Köhler; Stefan Sauerland; Edmund A.M. Neugebauer; R. Caprilli; A. Fingerhut; N.Y. Haboubi; L. Hultén; C.G.S. Hüscher; A. Jansen; H.-U. Kauczor; M.R.B. Keighley; F. Köckerling; W. Kruis; A. Lacy; K. Lauterbach; J. Leroy; J.M. Müller; H.E. Myrvold; P. Spinelli

In reputation-based peer-to-peer systems, reputation is used to build trust between peers and help selecting the right peers to download from. In this paper, we argue that reputation should not be used for service differentiation among the peers. To provide the right incentives for peers to share files and contribute to the system, the new concept of is introduced for partially decentralized peer-to-peer systems. Service differentiation is achieved based on the of the peers rather than their reputations. Simulation results assess the ability of the proposed algorithm to effectively identify free riders and malicious peers that upload malicious content, hence reducing the level of service provided to these peers and preserving network resources. On the other hand, good peers that contribute to the system receive better services which increases their satisfaction significantly.

Pp. 143-156

Diverticular Disease – Update 2006

M.E. Kreis; K.W. Jauch

In reputation-based peer-to-peer systems, reputation is used to build trust between peers and help selecting the right peers to download from. In this paper, we argue that reputation should not be used for service differentiation among the peers. To provide the right incentives for peers to share files and contribute to the system, the new concept of is introduced for partially decentralized peer-to-peer systems. Service differentiation is achieved based on the of the peers rather than their reputations. Simulation results assess the ability of the proposed algorithm to effectively identify free riders and malicious peers that upload malicious content, hence reducing the level of service provided to these peers and preserving network resources. On the other hand, good peers that contribute to the system receive better services which increases their satisfaction significantly.

Pp. 157-160

The EAES Clinical Practice Guidelines on Laparoscopic Resection of Colonic Cancer (2004)

Ruben Veldkamp; M. Gholghesaei; H.Jaap Bonjer; Dirk W. Meijer; M. Buunen; J. Jeekel; B. Anderberg; M.A. Cuesta; Alfred Cuschieri; Abe Fingerhut; J.W. Fleshman; P.J. Guillou; E. Haglind; J. Himpens; Christoph A. Jacobi; J.J. Jakimowicz; Ferdinand Koeckerling; Antonio M. Lacy; Emilio Lezoche; John R.T. Monson; Mario Morino; Edmund A.M. Neugebauer; S.D. Wexner; R.L. Whelan

In reputation-based peer-to-peer systems, reputation is used to build trust between peers and help selecting the right peers to download from. In this paper, we argue that reputation should not be used for service differentiation among the peers. To provide the right incentives for peers to share files and contribute to the system, the new concept of is introduced for partially decentralized peer-to-peer systems. Service differentiation is achieved based on the of the peers rather than their reputations. Simulation results assess the ability of the proposed algorithm to effectively identify free riders and malicious peers that upload malicious content, hence reducing the level of service provided to these peers and preserving network resources. On the other hand, good peers that contribute to the system receive better services which increases their satisfaction significantly.

Pp. 161-207

Colonic Cancer – Update 2006

Ruben Veldkamp; M. Gholghesaei; H.Jaap Bonjer; Dirk W. Meijer; M. Buunen; J. Jeekel; B. Anderberg; M.A. Cuesta; Alfred Cuschieri; Abe Fingerhut; J.W. Fleshman; P.J. Guillou; E. Haglind; J. Himpens; Christoph A. Jacobi; J.J. Jakimowicz; Ferdinand Koeckerling; Antonio M. Lacy; Emilio Lezoche; John R.T. Monson; Mario Morino; Edmund A.M. Neugebauer; S.D. Wexner; R.L. Whelan

In reputation-based peer-to-peer systems, reputation is used to build trust between peers and help selecting the right peers to download from. In this paper, we argue that reputation should not be used for service differentiation among the peers. To provide the right incentives for peers to share files and contribute to the system, the new concept of is introduced for partially decentralized peer-to-peer systems. Service differentiation is achieved based on the of the peers rather than their reputations. Simulation results assess the ability of the proposed algorithm to effectively identify free riders and malicious peers that upload malicious content, hence reducing the level of service provided to these peers and preserving network resources. On the other hand, good peers that contribute to the system receive better services which increases their satisfaction significantly.

Pp. 209-212

The EAES Clinical Practice Guidelines on Obesity Surgery (2005)

Stefan Sauerland; Luigi Angrisani; Mituku Belachew; J.M. Chevallier; Franco Favretti; Nicholas Finer; Abe Fingerhut; Manuel García Caballero; J.A. Guisado Macias; R. Mittermair; Mario Morino; Simon Msika; Francesco Rubino; Roberto Tacchino; Rudolf Weiner; Edmund A.M. Neugebauer

In reputation-based peer-to-peer systems, reputation is used to build trust between peers and help selecting the right peers to download from. In this paper, we argue that reputation should not be used for service differentiation among the peers. To provide the right incentives for peers to share files and contribute to the system, the new concept of is introduced for partially decentralized peer-to-peer systems. Service differentiation is achieved based on the of the peers rather than their reputations. Simulation results assess the ability of the proposed algorithm to effectively identify free riders and malicious peers that upload malicious content, hence reducing the level of service provided to these peers and preserving network resources. On the other hand, good peers that contribute to the system receive better services which increases their satisfaction significantly.

Pp. 213-257