Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas
Annual Review of Plant Biology
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial
No disponible.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
No disponibles.
Disponibilidad
Institución detectada | Período | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
---|---|---|---|---|
No detectada | desde ene. 2002 / hasta dic. 2023 | Annual Reviews |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
revistas
ISSN impreso
1543-5008
ISSN electrónico
1545-2123
Editor responsable
Annual Reviews Inc.
País de edición
Estados Unidos
Fecha de publicación
2002-
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
Where, When, and Why Do Plant Volatiles Mediate Ecological Signaling? The Answer Is Blowing in the Wind
Meredith C. Schuman
<jats:p> Plant volatiles comprise thousands of molecules from multiple metabolic pathways, distinguished by sufficient vapor pressure to evaporate into the headspace under normal environmental conditions. Many are implicated as ecological signals, but what is the evidence—and how do they work? Volatiles diffuse, are carried by wind, and may be taken up by other organisms or degrade with exposure to atmospheric ozone, radicals, and UV light; visual signals such as color are not subject to these complications (but require a line of sight). Distantly related plants—and nonplants—produce many of the same volatiles, yet specific compounds and blends may be distinct. Here, I present a quantitative review of the literature on plant volatiles as ecological signals, illustrating a field that has focused on developing ideas as much as reporting primary data. I discuss advantages and constraints, review recent advances, and propose considerations for primary studies to elucidate particular functions of plant volatiles. </jats:p>
Palabras clave: Cell Biology; Plant Science; Molecular Biology; Physiology.
Pp. 609-633
Salt-Tolerant Crops: Time to Deliver
Vanessa Melino; Mark Tester
<jats:p> Despite the numerous advances made in our understanding of the physiology and molecular genetics of salinity tolerance, there have been relatively few applications of these to improve the salt tolerance of crops. The most significant advances have historically utilized intraspecific variation, introgression of traits from close crop wild relatives, or, less frequently, introgression from more distant relatives. Advanced lines often fail due to difficulties in the introgression or tracking of traits or due to yield penalties associated with the alleles in nonsaline environments. However, the greatest limitation is that salinity is not a primary trait for breeders. We must close the gap between research and delivery, especially for farmers who have precious few alternatives. These efforts should include a reassessment of old techniques such as grafting current crops with salt-tolerant hybrid rootstocks. Alternatively, future crops can be produced via domestication of salt-tolerant wild species—an approach that is now feasible in our lifetime. </jats:p>
Palabras clave: Cell Biology; Plant Science; Molecular Biology; Physiology.
Pp. 671-696
Causes of Mutation Rate Variability in Plant Genomes
Daniela Quiroz; Mariele Lensink; Daniel J. Kliebenstein; J. Grey Monroe
<jats:p> Mutation is the source of all heritable diversity, the essential material of evolution and breeding. While mutation rates are often regarded as constant, variability in mutation rates has been observed at nearly every level—varying across mutation types, genome locations, gene functions, epigenomic contexts, environmental conditions, genotypes, and species. This mutation rate variation arises from differential rates of DNA damage, repair, and transposable element activation and insertion that together produce what is measured by DNA mutation rates. We review historical and recent investigations into the causes and consequences of mutation rate variability in plants by focusing on the mechanisms shaping this variation. Emerging mechanistic models point to the evolvability of mutation rate variation across genomes via mechanisms that target DNA repair, shaping the diversification of plants at phenotypic and genomic scales. </jats:p>
Palabras clave: Cell Biology; Plant Science; Molecular Biology; Physiology.
Pp. 751-775
Engineering Themes in Plant Forms and Functions
Rahel Ohlendorf; Nathanael Yi-Hsuen Tan; Naomi Nakayama
<jats:p> Living structures constantly interact with the biotic and abiotic environment by sensing and responding via specialized functional parts. In other words, biological bodies embody highly functional machines and actuators. What are the signatures of engineering mechanisms in biology? In this review, we connect the dots in the literature to seek engineering principles in plant structures. We identify three thematic motifs—bilayer actuator, slender-bodied functional surface, and self-similarity—and provide an overview of their structure–function relationships. Unlike human-engineered machines and actuators, biological counterparts may appear suboptimal in design, loosely complying with physical theories or engineering principles. We postulate what factors may influence the evolution of functional morphology and anatomy to dissect and comprehend better the why behind the biological forms. </jats:p>
Palabras clave: Cell Biology; Plant Science; Molecular Biology; Physiology.
Pp. 777-801