Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas

<jats:p> High-profile examples of scientific fraud continue to plague research. Recently, <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> published two news stories on alleged image manipulation in Alzheimer’s research and unreliable data in an ecology study, sadly showing that the problem persists. Each case involved back and forth among the journal, authors, and institutions to correct the scientific record. Journalists and advocates for research integrity (including courageous whistleblowers) are understandably frustrated about how long it takes to retract papers or at least to post editorial expressions of concern. It’s time to devise a more efficient solution. </jats:p>

<jats:p>Batteries allowing, CubeSats will target lunar ice and more</jats:p>

<jats:p>Other methods still put the United States somewhat ahead</jats:p>

<jats:p>Measures to capture carbon in soil may be less effective than hoped, scientists say</jats:p>

<jats:p>Embryonic tissue samples reveal how pelvis shape—primed for bipedalism—comes to life</jats:p>

<jats:p>Study implicates lack of key hormone, battle-weary immune cells, and awakened viruses</jats:p>

<jats:p>China now insists the pandemic didn’t start within its borders. Its scientists are publishing a flurry of papers pointing the finger elsewhere</jats:p>

<jats:p>Implications for nutrition, environment, and work may be considerable</jats:p>

<jats:p>Researchers seek to preserve materials that are formed at high pressure</jats:p>