Catálogo de publicaciones - libros

Compartir en
redes sociales


The Nature of Statistical Evidence

Bill Thompson

Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial

No disponible.

Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial

Statistical Theory and Methods

Disponibilidad
Institución detectada Año de publicación Navegá Descargá Solicitá
No detectada 2007 SpringerLink

Información

Tipo de recurso:

libros

ISBN impreso

978-0-387-40050-1

ISBN electrónico

978-0-387-40054-9

Editor responsable

Springer Nature

País de edición

Reino Unido

Fecha de publicación

Información sobre derechos de publicación

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Tabla de contenidos

A Critique of -Values

Bill Thompson

The use of significance tests to express statistical evidence has a long history.

III - Statistical Models of Induction | Pp. 102-115

The Nature of Statistical Evidence

Bill Thompson

As discussed in Chapter 8, Birnbaum introduces (), the evidential meaning of obtaining data as an instance of experiment E. Following Birnbaum, various authors have wrestled with the problem of developing a single set of postulates under which statistical inference can be made coherent. But as we claim in Section 8.3, ()does not exist. Evidence is grounds for belief—an imprecise concept. There must be many valid reasons for believing and hence many ways of making the evidence concept precise. Most of our beliefs are held because mother—or someone else we trust—told us so. The law trusts sworn testimony. Scientific and statistical evidence are other different grounds for belief—supposedly particularly reliable kinds. Instead of () we are concerned with (), the evidential meaning of observing v as an instance of E, in the context of theory T.

III - Statistical Models of Induction | Pp. 116-121

The Science of Statistics

Bill Thompson

On the inside of the front cover of each issue of its , the American Statistical Association declares that it is a scientific organization. In what sense is statistics scientific? There are several common usages of the word “science.” First, science is sometimes used as a synonym for systematized knowledge. Or, in more detail, a science is the systematized knowledge produced by the study of the structure of a class of concepts. A second usage is that science is explanation. Third and more narrowly, science is sometimes taken to mean the systemized knowledge of “nature,” of the “real world.” A fourth usage, due to Karl Pearson, is that any field of study which employs the scientific method of hypothesis, deduction and experiment is a science. A fifth usage is common in physics; Ruhla (1993) writes “prediction = science.”

III - Statistical Models of Induction | Pp. 122-125

Comparison of Evidential Theories

Bill Thompson

We start from the view that the purpose of statistical theory is to and what we choose to present as statistical evidence, i.e., what data and reasoning should cause us to adopt certain conclusions. We arrive at the position that there are kinds of statistical evidence, each of which lends a different explanatory insight and none of which is perfect. The explanatory models which we consider—along with their criteria—appear in Table 14.1.

III - Statistical Models of Induction | Pp. 126-132