Catálogo de publicaciones - libros
Título de Acceso Abierto
Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census
William P. O’Hare
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial
No disponible.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
Demography; Statistical Theory and Methods; Methodology of the Social Sciences
Disponibilidad
Institución detectada | Año de publicación | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
---|---|---|---|---|
No requiere | 2019 | SpringerLink |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
libros
ISBN impreso
978-3-030-10972-1
ISBN electrónico
978-3-030-10973-8
Editor responsable
Springer Nature
País de edición
Reino Unido
Fecha de publicación
2019
Información sobre derechos de publicación
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
Census Coverage of the Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Population
William P. O’Hare
In general, the count of Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders Alone or in Combination in the U.S. Census is relatively accurate. The net undercount rate for Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders Alone or in Combination in 2010 was 1.0% compared to a net overcount of 0.8% for the Non-Hispanic White Alone population. The omissions rate for Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders Alone or in Combination (7.9%) is about double the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). The Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders Alone or in Combination demographic group with the highest net undercount rate was males age 18–29 who had a net undercount rate of 8.0% in 2010. This is the only net undercount rate among Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders that was statistically significantly different than zero.
Pp. 109-115
Undercount Differentials by Tenure
William P. O’Hare
Over the past several decades the population living in rental housing units has consistently had net undercounts while the population living in owner-occupied housing units had net overcounts. In this Chapter the coverage differentials by tenure are analyzed and the impact of this differential on different sociodemographic groups is explored.
Pp. 117-122
Potential Explanations for Why People Are Missed in the U.S. Census
William P. O’Hare
Knowing the characteristic of people most likely to be missed in the Census is not the same as knowing why they are missed. In this Chapter information is provided on several of the leading ideas about why people are missed in the Census along with data related to many of the ideas. The topic is first approached from broad theoretical perspective then more detailed reasons are examined. The chapter draws heavily on the literature in survey research methodology.
Pp. 123-138
Census Bureau Efforts to Eliminate Differential Undercounts
William P. O’Hare
Over the past several decades the Census Bureau has engaged in many activities and programs aimed at reducing or eliminating differential undercounts. Several of the more prominent efforts to solve this problem are reviewed in this Chapter.
Pp. 139-148
Getting Ready for the 2020 Census
William P. O’Hare
As this book is being written, the 2020 Census is getting closer and the Census Bureau’s plans are becoming more concrete. However, there are several factors which raise concerns about whether differential undercounts will be reduced in the 2020 Census. Lack of adequate funding for the Census Bureau and high reliance on the internet are two areas which may lead to higher differential undercounts in 2020.
Pp. 149-161
Summary
William P. O’Hare
Differential undercounts in the US Census are a substantial and on-going problem. Some of the largest undercount differentials are outlined in this Chapter and the relationship between net undercounts and omissions is reiterated. The importance of the Census is highlighted and ways in which readers can get involved in promoting a better 2020 Census are described here.
Pp. 163-167